Real Estate has a perfect completion record in 17 of 22 studies

Real Estate goes 20 for 20, every one of its 20 tracked tickers finishing with a usable backtest, in 17 of Tenachine's 22 published studies. No other sector matches that. Energy has never gone 20 for 20 in any of the 22. Neither has Financials, and neither has Communication Services. Real Estate's perfect record and Energy's complete absence of one sit on opposite ends of the same simple count, counted the same way across every study on the site rather than picked from a favorable handful.

Tenachine's guide on Energy's weak completion rate checked three studies and found Real Estate sitting near the good end without ever quite claiming the single best spot in that smaller sample. Running the same check across all 22 published studies rather than three finds the pattern that sample was too small to catch: Real Estate is not just doing well, it is the sector most likely of all eleven to complete every one of its tickers, by a clear margin over the next tier.

Zero is not as rare as it sounds

Energy shares its zero with two other sectors, Financials and Communication Services, so never posting a perfect completion is not on its own what sets Energy apart. What does is how far short each of the three falls when it misses. Financials completes an average of 17.3 of its 20 tickers across the 22 studies, missing perfect by less than 3 tickers on average. Communication Services averages 17.1 of 20, a similar gap. Energy averages 15.1 of 20, missing perfect by nearly 5 tickers on average, the widest shortfall of the three. Missing a perfect record and missing it badly are two different measurements, and Energy is the one sector that loses on both, which is the same depth-of-failure point the guide on its worst completion rate already made from a narrower sample.

Real Estate's own bad day

Real Estate is not flawless. Its worst single showing across all 22 studies is 12 of 20 completed tickers, 60 percent, under three weeks tight, the same study where Consumer Discretionary also had its worst showing. A sector that goes perfect 17 times out of 22 still has 5 studies where something kept a quarter or more of its tickers from producing a usable run, and Tenachine does not publish why any individual ticker's backtest failed, so this remains an open question rather than a solved one, the same limit already named in the Energy guide.

None of this says anything about whether Real Estate or Energy stocks make good investments. A completion rate describes whether a strategy's rules produced a usable trade record for a ticker over the ten year window, not whether that record was profitable. A sector that completes reliably can still lose money once it runs, and a sector that struggles to complete can still post a strong return on the tickers that do finish, the same distinction Tenachine's guide on Energy's own sector pattern already draws between finishing a backtest and winning one. Before reading either sector's headline return on any study, checking how many of its 20 tickers actually completed is worth the extra step, and now there is a full 22-study answer for which two sectors sit at the far ends of that specific question, rather than the three-study sample that first raised it.